Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2025-08-01
Abstract Views: 0
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v66iCD12.2976
Issue
Vol. 66 No. CĐ12-NCKH
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Toàn, P. M., & Hà, Đỗ T. (2025). 51. DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A QUESTIONNAIRE ON NURSE-PERPETRATED VIOLENCE IN PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE IN VIETNAM. Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine, 66(CĐ12-NCKH). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v66iCD12.2976

51. DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A QUESTIONNAIRE ON NURSE-PERPETRATED VIOLENCE IN PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE IN VIETNAM

Phan Minh Toan1, Do Thi Ha2
1 Ho Chi Minh city Hospital for Rehabilitation - Professional Disease
2 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and assess the validity and reliability of a survey questionnaire regarding violence against nurses participating in pre-hospital emergency care in Vietnam.


Method: The instrument was developed in three phases: item generation, expert-based content validation, and pilot testing for reliability.


Results: The newly developed questionnaire demonstrated excellent content validity, with all items achieving a CVI, I-CVI of 1 and an S-CVI/Ave of 1. The KR-20 reliability coefficient was 0.91. Test-retest reliability conducted after a two-week interval yielded a KR-20 of 0.90. Spearman’s correlation was employed to assess the stability and internal consistency of the questionnaire, resulting in a coefficient of 0.99 (p < 0.01). When administered to a sample of 600 emergency prehospital care nurses, the questionnaire achieved a KR-20 of 0.91 following the test-retest reliability assessment after two weeks.


Conclusion: The questionnaire is valid and reliable for assessing workplace violence among pre-hospital emergency nurses in Vietnam and serves as a practical tool for its identification and prevention.

Article Details

Keywords

Validity, reliability, violence, nurses, prehospital emergency care.

References

[1] Shabanikiya H, Kokabisaghi F, Mojtabaeian M, Sahebi T, Varmaghani M. Global Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Paramedics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Health Emergencies Disasters Q, 2021 Jul 10, 6 (4): 205-16.
[2] Bhattarai H.K, Bhusal S, Barone-Adesi F, Hubloue I. Prehospital Emergency Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Prehospital Disaster Med, 2023 Aug, 38 (4): 495-512.
[3] Wang P.Y, Fang P.H, Wu C.L, Hsu H.C, Lin C.H. Workplace Violence in Asian Emergency Medical Services: A Pilot Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019 Oct, 16 (20): 3936.
[4] Brislin R.W. Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. J Cross-Cult Psychol, 1970 Sep 1, 1 (3): 185-216.
[5] Madadizadeh F, Bahariniya S. Tutorial on how to calculating content validity of scales in medical research. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag, 2023 Jun 1, 31: 100315.
[6] Hu Y, Luo Q, Li R, Zhang M, Wang Y, Su P et al. Anti-violence measures developed by ILO and WHO: Analysis of the prevalence of workplace violence and the effects of implementation in a general hospital in China. Front Public Health, 2022 Dec 14, 10: 1049832.
[7] Khiaw-Im N, Aimyong N, Wongrathanandha C, Tangsangwornthamma C. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Content Validity of Thai Version of Workplace Violence in the Health Sector Country Case Study Questionnaire. J Prim Care Community Health, 2022, 13: 21501319221132448.